Skip to content


Comparing Traditional Box Modeling with Circle Curve-Based Box Modeling


In the field of 3D modeling, box modeling has been a fundamental technique used to create 3D objects. Traditionally, box modeling involves using an "imaginary" profile curve as a reference to guide the overall curvature of the object being modeled. This is typically inferred information from the reference material and the conclusion made by the artist driven by intuition and experience and most importantly vision. Imaginary in the sense that the overall core curvature exists sorely as observed information and not technically displayed within the machine. However, a new approach has emerged that utilizes literal Bezier curves as the inner profile curve of the object's curvature. This article aims to compare these two methods and explore the potential trade-offs and benefits of using actual profile curves as opposed to perceived imaginary ones.

Traditional Box Modeling

Traditional box modeling relies on the modeler's ability to visualize and mentally project an imaginary profile curve onto the object being modeled. This imaginary curve serves as a reference to guide the placement and manipulation of polygons or subdivisions to achieve the desired curvature. The modeler must rely on their experience, intuition, and artistic sense to create a smooth and aesthetically pleasing shape.

While this approach has been widely used and has proven to be effective, it does have some limitations. The reliance on an imaginary curve can lead to inconsistencies and variations in the final model, especially when multiple modelers are working on the same project. Additionally, the lack of a literal reference curve can make it challenging to maintain precise control over the curvature and achieve consistent results.

Circle Curve-Based Box Modeling

In contrast to traditional box modeling, the circle curve-based approach introduces a literal Bezier curve as the inner profile curve of the object's curvature. This method involves drawing a Bezier curve that defines the desired shape of the object's profile. Along this curve, constrained Bezier circles are placed using a one-to-one ratio transference of information, with each circle having four control points.

The use of actual profile curves offers several advantages over the imaginary curve approach. Firstly, it provides a tangible reference that can be precisely manipulated and adjusted to achieve the desired curvature. The modeler has direct control over the shape of the curve, enabling them to create smooth and accurate transitions between different sections of the model.

Furthermore, the one-to-one ratio transference of information using constrained Bezier circles allows for a more structured and predictable modeling process. Each circle's four control points correspond directly to specific points on the profile curve, ensuring a consistent and controllable relationship between the curve and the resulting geometry.

Trade-offs and Benefits

While the circle curve-based approach offers several benefits, it is important to consider the potential trade-offs compared to traditional box modeling.

One potential drawback is the increased complexity introduced by the use of literal Bezier curves and constrained circles. This approach may require a deeper understanding of curve manipulation and a more methodical workflow compared to the more intuitive and freeform nature of traditional box modeling.

However, the benefits of using actual profile curves can outweigh the added complexity. The increased precision and control over the curvature can lead to more accurate and consistent results, especially when multiple modelers are collaborating on the same project. The literal reference curve also allows for easier communication and sharing of the intended shape, reducing the potential for misinterpretation or inconsistencies.

Additionally, the structured nature of the circle curve-based approach can facilitate the creation of more complex and organic shapes. By defining the profile curve and using constrained circles, modelers can achieve smooth and intricate curvatures that may be challenging to create using traditional box modeling techniques.


In conclusion, the comparison between traditional box modeling and circle curve-based box modeling reveals distinct approaches to creating 3D objects. While traditional box modeling relies on an imaginary profile curve, the circle curve-based method utilizes a literal Bezier curve as the inner profile curve of the object's curvature.

The use of actual profile curves offers benefits such as increased precision, control, and consistency in the modeling process. However, it also introduces additional complexity compared to the more intuitive nature of traditional box modeling.

Ultimately, the choice between these two approaches depends on the specific requirements of the project, the desired level of control and accuracy, and the modeler's personal preferences and skills. By understanding the trade-offs and benefits of each method, modelers can make informed decisions and select the approach that best suits their needs in creating compelling and visually appealing 3D models.